AND THE - Blog Posts

OUGHHHH.. OFHHGHFNDJDMDDM XOSKSMSKAKAM MANWHEHRHRHGHGEHEHEHEHEHENSNS ENRRHEHHAAHHR RAHHH RAHHH RHAHANSJDJDDJJD🤯🤯💯💥💯💥🤯💥💯💯🫵🤯🫵🤯🤯😳🤯🫵💯😳💯😳🤯😍😍😍😍🎉💯🎉🎉💯🥳

me and gang as wof dragons ..

I get to do a personality analysis for school (it's instead of a test) and I'm stuck between two characters. Can y'all please help me decide?

Sketch

men only want one thing and its disgusting (robotic body enhancements)

kiss me I’m seeing red

Shantotto vs Cefca in chess!

damn can you draw something else

Adding on to the [Feral] Broodmare OP AU:

OP would probably step down from his duties as a leader to be a broodmare (or not and he's both of them)

Titties,,,,his titties will get bigger with time and pregnancy obv

If he does step down, he's constantly pregnant with Megatron's sparklings. Maybe Elita's for some time.

He's pampered every day.

He's looked up to as a fertility god/dess of sorts because of the amount of times he's gotten pregnant.

He snarls anytime someone isn't invited to the nest and tries anyway.

He drains the sires (mainly Megatron) of their transfluid. He doesn't stop until he has an even larger bump.

When he isn't pregnant, his body is so curvy and chubby. Tho it's enough to get others to push him to the berth and breed him full until he's filled with babies. (They want to see him get even thicker/bigger).

He whimpers when they get rough with him. (It turns them on so much that they're practically slamming into his valve and hes left squealing and squirting.)

When the sparklings are kicking at his internals and his spine feels like it's about to give up, the sires are massaging him and sometimes they would lift his belly to get the pressure off his back.

If he doesn't step down as leader: he's still full of sparklings (probably less of the time but I doubt it). He's still training while his bump isn't visible. His EM field is content and leads to the mechs being very comfortable around him

(I'd like to imagine that while he's reading a datapad, that he always has a servo on his bump.)

…..why does that make sense?

Okay these songs are siblings

In the same way this song

is the father of this song

And this song

is the estranged but not so different cousin to this song

DO YOU GET WHAT I MEAN!?!?

Any one want to suggest how we perspective writers can minimize this debate while still utilizing this trope? It's good character developing drama (in Little Woman [haven't wanted to watch GOT]) but I wouldn't want the drama to divide the fandom and continue after the book (or other media)

In the endless discussion of female gender presentation in fiction pop culture, I've noticed a slight trend.

When a fictional tomboy and girly girl are portrayed as foils to each other – especially if they're sisters – the majority of fans will claim that the girly girl is "privileged" while the tomboy is the underdog. But a decent number of other fans will backlash against this idea and claim that the tomboy is the real "privileged" one.

I've definitely seen this in discussions of Little Women's Jo and Amy, and if I'm not mistaken, it's common in discussions of Arya and Sansa in A Song of Ice and Fire/Game of Thrones too.

This is the gist of the debate:

Fans of the tomboy see the girly girl receive the social rewards that are won by performing femininity and ladylike manners, while the tomboy is socially punished and shamed for not being ladylike. They empathize with the tomboy's jealousy of the girly girl, and they resent the girly girl for it, viewing her as the one who has all the luck and gets all the love and respect.

The counterargument is that the tomboy actually receives more love and respect than the girly girl does. If not from society in general, then from family members and friends, especially male ones. They adore the tomboy and find her boyishness and wildness endearing, whereas they judge and ridicule the girly girl for her "silly," "vain" feminine tastes, even if they love her too. They don't give her as much attention or understanding as they give the tomboy, which must be very hard for her, and which the tomboy fails to appreciate.

It's an interesting debate, because there's always truth on both sides.

In a pre-20th century setting, and maybe today too, there is no "privileged" gender presentation for girls. Tomboyishness might be seen as endearing in a child or a teenager, but even among the people who love the tomboy the most, there's an understanding that can only be temporary; as a woman, she'll need to be "tamed" and learn to perform femininity. Meanwhile, girly girls are mocked as "silly," "vain," "prissy," etc., but it's also understood that they're behaving exactly the way they're supposed to behave. Young men in period settings might have more friendships with tomboys, but it's the girly girls whom they usually favor romantically. Both forms of gender presentation are punished in some way or other. Misogyny makes it a no-win situation.

The claim that girly girl characters get less attention from their families than their tomboy sisters is probably subjective, though. I'll let individual readers decide whether or not they think Ned Stark neglects Sansa, the March parents favor Jo over Amy, etc.

We also tend to see the claim from fans of the girly girl character that the author is biased in the tomboy's favor. But that's another issue for another post.

i think there was a time that charles, for all of his good-doing and faith in humanity, would have walked away from it all if it meant that erik would come with him

like, i understand that his character is driven by helping others, but erik was the exception. erik was the exception from the moment they met, and erik was the exception when charles chose to shout about how erik left him above everything else twice