Latest Posts by psrinklers - Page 2

every time i see a post that only references a character named tim i need to do a massive double take to figure out if it’s tim drake or tim stoker

Fanon batfam fans are scary man. Why are they always fantasizing about Tim or Jason telling Damian, “if u don’t shut up i will sleep with ur grandpa/mom. Already did it.”

Like, telling a minor (who’s usually depicted as 10-11 in fanon) about ur sexual activities (with his OWN FAMILY MEMBERS) is actually weird as hell… Especially when they say it as soon as damian opens his mouth to say legit anything…

post exam season deep cleans >>>

rewatching the under the red hood movie and i gotta say as much as i love jason’s speech to bruce about how mad he is that the joker’s still alive, i still maintain that a severely underrated speech in this movie is from ra’s when he’s talking to bruce and in essence says ‘yeah so i hired the joker to distract you which was my bad because he totally went overboard and killed your son :/ and i felt so guilty i decided not to try and fight you anymore and then i stole your son’s corpse and tried to revive him via lazarus pit so i could like. make amends. except that was also my bad because we fucked that one up real good and when he came back out BOY was he weird in the head. killed my guys and then fucking jumped out a window and we lost him. my bad. and i thought he’d died again but apparently he’s in gotham and is like. totally destroying your whole lives which again, my bad. shouldn’t have tried to help. sorry about that. i’ll just stay out of your business from now on.’ which is actually the funniest characterisation of ra’s i’ve ever seen

this is pure evil

making it so that tim is in jason’s shadow in any major way is a disservice to both of their characters

for some reason dick & jason's relationship is often written as if jason was supposed to know plenty about dick even before they met for the first time, but in canon he knew close to nothing other than the fact that he was the previous robin (or rather, not even that, but i sort of refuse to believe that the topic did not come up even *once,* no matter how much bruce would like to avoid it). hence, i think upon hearing that dick used to be in a circus, jay should (completely seriously) ask him if he was a clown

happy 46 years since the release of Unknown Pleasures!!

lost days jason is just so good. I love him. He tries to be badass and cool and full of revenge and he just can’t. He keeps going on sidequests to help innocent people and kids. He’s like “talia I wanna kill the joker and Batman” and she’s like “of course, here’s a lot of money” and he comes back to have tea with her and bitch about the joker and Batman and also tell her about how he saved London from getting blown up. like obviously he got his stuff together by the time utrh rolls around (sorta), but man, lost days was a hard time for a very compassionate man trying to be ruthless

the fact that jason verbalising the idea of bruce killing him over the joker is what finally makes jason break into tears causes me think that this is the moment he understood that it was truly possible for bruce to kill him

Considering every attempt at bringing Jason Todd back as a villain (Dixon’s AU attempt in ‘96, Loeb’s Hush attempt in ‘03, + Winick’s successful UTH attempt in ‘04-5) was predicated on retconning Jaybin into someone that he wasn’t, I actually don’t think you can remove Red Hood from the discussion of how DC write Jason as a child. You can prefer one over the other if you want, but Red Hood + all his problems only exist because DC needed to villainise Jason Todd somewhere along his character history to prove that Jaybin’s death was a net positive.

The second Robin receiving an embryonic Red Hood-ification in Cheer, Robin Lives + apparently Lemire’s Robin + Batman was the whole point of Jason coming back as a Bad Guy to begin with. And at a stroke, it returns us to Marv Wolfman + Dixon’s classist victim-blaming narrative. And to their intended goal — to blatantly overwrite Jason Todd’s actual character with stereotypes to preserve the Batman + Robin power fantasy.

I have used dog metaphors to describe Jason in his relationships with others on multiple occasions but Alfred straight up telling Bruce that maybe he needs to take his new puppy back to the shelter is not something even I could’ve come up with

in depth analysis of the (beginning of the) final confrontation of batman: under the hood

batman goes in with the mindset of trying to appeal to jason and get his son back and/or with the motivation to save the joker. is batman trying to save the joker out of his belief in the sanctity of life or to stop jason from murder, saving him from himself?

jason is taunting batman with memories of who they once were, drawing on how poetic it would be for that bond to become severed in the very same place. it has the effect of making batman more emotionally fragile and reminding him that the person he sees before him is still the same boy. it confronts him with the care he tries to hide and the effect of his actions on the innocent kid jason once was. however batman still tries to hide under his cowl and his mission, not indulging in jason’s taunts and shortly as possible asking ‘where is he?’ knowing that the ‘he’ would be correctly interpreted as the joker.

jason continues to assert his knowledge and control of the situation using his prolonged speech whilst further flaunting his suffering as a way to hurt bruce and make him vulnerable. batman hides once again and tries to combat jason’s control by being to the point and focused on the joker, not even using the jokers name or recognising any familiarity with his son. then both of them give up on communicating verbally and resort to the language they’re used to- violence.

jason puts a face of apathy over the death of a whole city, presumed to include his adopted brother. instead of horror he opts to rub in the grief that batman has now been confronted by the past and present failure of his mentees. but the ellipsis may show his true vulnerability or may be a way to further make his mocking dramatic. whilst the blowing of bludhaven was not intentional on jason’s part, this works in jason’s favour the most in terms of making batman hurt and vulnerable.

batman tries to save his son in vain, mostly because of his ill timing once again. jason sees his own confrontation between him and batman as taking priority, using cold rationale that there’s no saving ‘Dickie’ and taunting of batman’s moral code to ensure batman stays in the most effective way. batman has now lost his cold demeanour in desperate heartbreak, fatherhood prevailing as he pleads ‘Jason please, I-‘ in an extremely uncharacteristic manner. he finally acknowledges his son by using his name, says ‘please’, putting himself as inferior, and finally doesn’t even finish his sentence as he’s completely lost his composure. it’s extremely cruel but jason’s response is his own way of showing his desperation to keep his father in his place and maintain his control over the situation. jason isn’t denying that batman cares for nightwing, just as he wouldn’t refute that batman cares for him, in fact he weaponises that care to show that it’s futile; no matter how hard he tries to save them, they still end up dead because he won’t remove the problem at the source and continues to risk them for his moral code and idealistic hope.

jason continues being talkative as a way to maintain control, to distract, and show how vindictive he is now that’s he’s changed from the innocent robin. he brags about his underhanded techniques that are far from the technical greatness that his opponent taught him and begins to patronise in a way to undermine him and further prove how he is the ‘better batman’ in his mostly un-theatrical and practical costume. he also recognises and mocks batman having to improve after jason revealed a weakness of his previously. batman finally gives into the fight talking and takes the upper hand once again by revealing jason’s hypocrisy in his critique of batman’s reliance on weapons by burning his jacket. this serves as an act of showing that he’s not holding back, no matter how much he may care for jason.

batman knows that he failed his son but he incorrectly presumes the failure that jason is caught up on. he presumes jason’s issue with him is more unsalvageable, that being the fact that he wasn’t saved from being murdered. batman projects his own guilt of not being enough to save jason on him and can’t imagine any other reason, namely the way jason’s whole existence was erased as if he never existed, and most importantly that the joker has had countless more victims since. the ellipsis shows his hesitance and attempt to be gentle with his appeal to his son, perhaps being unsure how to ever ‘fix’ jason’s hurt over being murdered. ‘I tried to save you’ implies that batman thinks jason believes he wasn’t cared about enough in life for his father to stop his murder or he’s trying to make jason see the logic that it wasn’t batman’s fault- here he names jason to show that he’s attempting to talk to him as ‘bruce’ to ‘jason’ with a sense of familiarity. the ‘I’m…I’m’ when talking about ‘trying to save you now’ shows his struggle with emotional vulnerability and an awareness of how cruel it is to claim that he’s trying to ‘save’ his son by looming over his crumpled body after beating him to a pulp. batman had never tried to truly talk to jason other than when it seemed he was physically and dynamically in control and this is only after resorting to violence first (although he was goaded into it), the exception to this being when nightwing was at stake. jason only responds to this meagre justification with desperate anger, pointing a gun pathetically at him and responding incredulously with the rhetorical questions ‘this what you think this is about? you letting me die?’ at every point previously jason had seemed to perfectly predict batman’s intelligent yet emotionally stunted thought processes however he is truly caught off guard at batman’s lack of deduction. he then goes on to question which side of the man has failed his ‘judgement’- the guilty father/hero or the narrow and single minded man on a mission. he criticises his ‘antiquated sense of morality’ that being a reference to his repellant to death at all costs, both jason’s and the joker’s equally as suggested by the past and present ways of trying to save jason from death and murdering. for the first time it jason addresses bruce without a hint of mocking behind the name and tells him earnestly that ‘i forgive you for not saving me.’ this carries the implication that jason knows that bruce is at fault for his death in some ways but that his main concern wasn’t with the things that bruce couldn’t control about his death, perhaps seeing a grudge as useless or genuinely forgiving even without a direct apology. jason forgave bruce and sheila in his final moments, knowing that the circumstances of his death of a fatal combination of fear, helplessness, and coincidences. he died a hero, he just wished he was remembered as one by being worthy enough to make batman stop the joker for good, not a victim who projected his hurt over dying on the one who failed to save him.

jason gets up from his position on the floor and aggressively and indignantly gets to the point of his confrontation- why is the joker alive? the repetition of ‘why’, use of ellipsis, the exclamation of ‘on god’s earth’, and excessive use of punctuation all express how unthinkable and rage inducing it is for the joker to live, adding to how baffling it is to jason that batman thought his problem was not being saved. it implies that jason had the full assumption that batman would kill the joker- it was not a special demand but an expectation- so the fact that the minimum for being cared for after his death wasn’t fulfilled or even understood further hurts and enrages him.

here jason truly tries to be persuasive by being as open as possible in his criticism, a change from his previous snarky comments, insults, and arrogance. by beginning the speech with what he is supposedly ‘ignoring’ various points before listing them out furthers how valid his point is, showing his empathy and desires are rooted not only in himself- perhaps implying that bruce’s are- but also the wider suffering caused by one man. the list begins with the more distant, more inconceivable picture of ‘entire graveyards’ and ends with a reference to barbara, going from a more logical quantity of suffering to the more personal pain and responsibility over a loved one. there’s an appeal to ‘the past’, showing his expectation of killing is not based on character or the supposed worth of the joker but as vengeance and prevention of suffering in the future as implied by the phrasing of jason being ‘the last person you’d ever let him hurt’; this both could mean the joker should have died after ‘killing’ jason or that he never should have lived long enough to ‘hurt’ jason at all. through the phrasing of ‘let him’, jason makes it so that batman is responsible for the jokers actions through his own inaction in killing him or preventing his atrocities. the repetition of ‘i thought’ before revealing how mistaken he was in having faith in bruce shows his vulnerability and hurt, maybe seeing now how futile his arguments are against the cold expression of batman’s cowl as suggested by his hesitance to declare his own care. the emphasis on ‘me’ is both a way to convince bruce to see what he should have been valued as a son and a plea to be affirmed that he was enough of a son at all. jason then goes on the express his own care through the conditional of ‘if it had been you’ and how unexpected it was that the same was not done for him in reality. the violent imagery and blunt language of a ‘bloody mass’ is a reminder of the suffering that jason went through other than the bomb and his actual death- this is a more vulnerable and vivid imagining compared the unrealistic references to your own death. this comparison also seems more cruel on the part of bruce because whilst jason’s unreciprocated feelings of care in vengeance can be seen from the lens of batman and robin as a partnership, it’s also on the level of a parent and child with the scenario of a child going after his fathers murderer compared with a father not being willing to do the same for the other. there is the emphasised ‘you’ which contrasts to the previous ‘me’, which shows that despite how much reasoning jason may give, his issues are about bruce not valuing jason as much as he thought he did. the hyperbolic language of ‘search the planet’ and excessive pejoratives of ‘pathetic pile of evil, death-worshipping garbage’ ends his argument with a tone of anger, reflecting his conviction in his hypothetical actions if bruce were to be the one to be murdered. the whole time jason is kneeled over the joker whilst pointing a gun at a hunched over batman. this reflects the levels of power of each of the people in the room through the visible heights, along with their attitudes, with batman being closed off and shameful, jason being aggressive in his attempt to have power over batman through weaponising his words, and the joker just gleefully observing. the bottom left panel has batman coldly looking at jason, with his cowl acting as a facade to his emotions, contrasted to jason who is angry almost to the point of tears and splattered with his own blood. the backgrounds mirror all of this with batman having a white background, not restricted to a panel and holding the most power, emotional composure, and moral superiority, this juxtaposed with jason only having a fraction of his face showing on the bottom right. jason looks straight forward whereas batman looks at jason, maybe implying that jason’s message is just as much for the reader as it is for batman or just representing how open he is with his emotions.

batman now faces forward (now in the position of giving his view to the reader), bares his teeth, and gives a short vague reply telling jason that he doesn’t ‘understand’, either implying jason never saw the true purpose behind the dedication to never kill, bruce himself, or the idea of batman and it’s incompatibility with killing. jason once again starts asking rhetorical questions, both showing he is more open to understanding bruce and that he still does not ‘understand’ by assuming what bruce is talking about at all despite bruce implying that he can’t have thought of it. jason thinks it’s a matter of ‘moral code’ and it’s harsh limits, maybe mocking his deontological views on the lack of reasoning behind not killing other than not being allowed by an abstract ‘line.’ bruce, with a downturned head, mournfully replies ‘no’, emphasised by the repetition, ellipsis and phrase ‘god almighty’ showing his true vulnerability for a moment. then batman shockingly says that killing the joker would be ‘too damned easy’, revealing his innermost temptations as a figure defined by his closed off stoicism that threat to completely destroy his control over his mission if he even gives in once. the use of black, white, and the walls of the building are symbolic of the emotions of the moment. in the 1st panel, batman has one black eye and one white showing through his cowl, in the 3rd it is completely black but concealed through the shadow created by his downturned head, and by the 4th, both of his eyes are shadowed over. the 2nd and 3rd panel looks as though batman is projecting darkness over the scene and almost reaching jason with it (with jason’s outstretched arm reaching back), contrasting to the white background he inhabited in the previous page and perhaps representing his darkness, shame, sadness, or emotional vulnerability. the 1st panel and 5th mirror each other through the use of a dark and light eye and flip the dynamics of their positions in the previous page, with jason now looking coldly to the side. the broken mask shows jason’s conflict residing both in vigilantism and personal relationship, his facade of cruelty and his authentic tears, his role as an antagonist and his position as a sympathetic son.

so many fanfics- even and especially jason centric ones- revolve around this victim blaming idea that jason is just stupid and needs to see the truth aka bruce is god always right and he is always wrong and he shouldnt trust his own thoughts and intuition

there'll be a fic where jason thought bruce was a pedophile all through his days in the manor and the finale is 'jason just needed to accept that he was stupid to think that and say sorry to bruce' instead of 'an adult couldnt convince a child in his care that he wasnt going to rape him after three whole years and needs to change something in his behavior'

fic says jason comes back to gotham after bruce beat him into a coma and told him never to return and fears retaliation and the thesis is 'jason is stupid for thinking his ~family~ would ever hurt him brucie is so sorry he somehow made jason think hes not welcome here' instead of 'beating anyone near death is a severe crime and the psychological pain of that doesnt just go away when the abuser aggressor says oopsie'

fic has an injured jason not feeling safe in an unsecured home and every one of the batfamily makes him open the doors and windows and walk on a broken leg and prove they can break in without him knowing and this is heartwarming? them ignoring his emotional well being to show they care? making someone scared and hurt is good family behavior and jason is just too stupid to understand that

how does that make sense? why do we do this? what do i have to block out of my ao3 searches to not see it anymore? fics will have straight up cult like emotional manipulation played as heartwarming... this shit is so triggering to me as an abuse survivor

tag your fics victim blaming, horror, mind break, emotional manipulation, anything please i beg

Swift-footed Achilles, son of Peleus 🏹

Prints

i respect people's right to trash on red hood BUT I DRAW THE LINE AT BEING RUDE ABOUT JAYBIN. he did nothing wrong ever he was two apples tall and baby

the creature (frankenstein) and jason todd parallels:

associations with death and therefore transgression

negative influence of father figures

questions of nature vs. nurture

sympathetic killer and antagonist

a ‘rebirth’ that leads them into vengeance against the neglect of their father figures, along with giving them agency through education or cognisance after being deprived of the ability to realise their suffering- the delaceys and lazarus pit

being rejected of their one morally questionable wish towards their father figure

goes on a path of vengeance that leads to their deaths

lower class or representative of them that is given a ‘voice’

dismissed from their emotions because of their violence/intimidating stature

strange niche of characters who would read frankenstein and cry because they related to the creature

under the clarity of i have still not slept and it’s half past 4 in the morning, i can safely say that i was wrong:

jason would have a plan for being caught, in fact he would have a whole speech prepared complete with citations. this doesn’t mean that at this point he wouldn’t crumple like damp paper as soon as bruce tries to bring him home, either going with him or running away, but he’d give a valiant effort. (maybe, secretly, he was hoping or even relying on being caught here, making him all the more at a loss when faced with the detonator in the actual comic.)

lost days jason being picked up by the scruff of his neck after batman accidentally catches him planting the bomb on the batmobile. jason immediately goes to attack but because he’s not trained to kill as well as he is later on he’s disarmed quite easily. jason looking so young, not having killed anyone yet, and not being in control of the situation through careful planning meaning bruce is more likely to accept him but jason’s emotions are completely raw to where his actions are just fully calculated fury and hurt. also this is before wargames and stephanie’s death so that would make bruce have less emotionally vulnerable because his lack of fresh grief and guilt.

lost days jason being picked up by the scruff of his neck after batman accidentally catches him planting the bomb on the batmobile. jason immediately goes to attack but because he’s not trained to kill as well as he is later on he’s disarmed quite easily. jason looking so young, not having killed anyone yet, and not being in control of the situation through careful planning meaning bruce is more likely to accept him but jason’s emotions are completely raw to where his actions are just fully calculated fury and hurt. also this is before wargames and stephanie’s death so that would make bruce have less emotionally vulnerable because his lack of fresh grief and guilt.

“He would not fucking say that” except its the badly written source material so he did, in fact, say that

Everything about the new Jason Todd robin issue sucks but I am taking slight joy in Alfred proving me right on him being Jason Todd's biggest hater

Star Sapphire Jason Todd, but the ring shows up after the Batarang Incident as his people are dragging him to Leslie’s clinic, which results in

Ring: Jason Todd of Ear-

Goon 1: Dude, you can’t just say that, don’t you know ANYTHING about vigilantes?

Goon 2: Yeah, when he’s in the suit he’s Red Hood, get it right

Ring:

Ring: Red Hood of Earth,

Goon 3: “Of Earth?” That’s weird, man

Goon 1: Yeah, if anything he’s “of Gotham”

Goon 2: Nah, Hood’s “of Crime Alley”

And Jason is sitting there trying not to laugh as his people bully a fucking Lantern Ring, because he’s still bleeding and Leslie would genuinely eviscerate him for moving before she’s done with his stitches. Eventually they end up forcing the ring to explicitly lay out everything that accepting the ring would entail like it’s a work contract, and he’s actually kind of proud of them because it meant they were listening, and he doesn’t have the heart to tell them he already knows what a Star Sapphire is (though he did technically learn a few details he hadn’t known before, so it was probably good they did it anyway).

Anyway, the ring eventually makes its offer (calling him Red Hood of Crime Alley in a bid to not be interrupted), and Jason waits as his goons debate the pros and cons, wondering when the ring will realize he can’t actually give verbal consent at the moment due to the, y’know, recently slit throat.

He eventually does accept the ring, once it’s determined that he can choose his outfit and won’t draw too much attention to himself by glowing. It’s probably pretty good timing, since even though Leslie did a good job putting him back together (while all of this was going on, the ring refused to leave him and his people were adamant on fighting for his legal rights against the cosmic entity, which she tolerated as long as they helped and stayed physically out of the way), his throat still hurts like a bitch and the healing magic that rushes through him is pure relief. Anyway, due to the way they had the ring word the proposal, the newest Star Sapphire is logged officially as “Red Hood of Crime Alley,” and Hal immediately starts sweating, absolutely dreading having to tell Spooky that his Crime Lord Problem just got significantly more complicated.

Leslie bargains to have Jason use healing magic on more severe cases, and they set up a schedule for him to work shifts at the clinic, and then she immediately goes to beat Batman’s ass for what happened since she is well aware of who Jason Todd is, and the goons may have already forcefully ejected his name from their minds in respect, but she still hasn’t forgiven Bruce for forcing her to perform an honestly pretty irrelevant autopsy on the kid. She can ask him how he came back later.

Jason is just trying to see how accurately he can form construct versions of his guns. The pink is a bit much, but the unlimited ammo is pretty sweet

i also think people try to equate bruce and jason’s flaws as vigilantes despite the fact that they are representative of two distinct issues. wrt bruce there is a dissonance between his awareness of the law as a tangible, corruptible institution versus his belief in the law as an intangible, incorruptible ideology (hence his relationship with gordon as a “good cop” who uniquely upholds the law as bruce sees it despite the fact that gordon is realistically as much an extension and product of the corruptible institution as much as anyone else is, and the ideology bruce wants to believe in is created by the institution). wrt jason there is a dissonance between his helplessness in the face of the institution and his over-corrective ideology that thereby bleeds into a mimicry of said institution (which you could correctly criticize as character assassination of the socially marginalized, and/or use as a conduit to explore the divide between defensive and offensive vigilantism)

adding onto this, it’s so important to me that jason was chosen for his heart even when classist stereotypes would expect him to be naturally violent, cruel, and selfish.

he only becomes more aggressive and bitter the more time he spends as robin BECAUSE of robin. he saw all the injustice first hand in violent crime and the ineffective, corrupt system and he became frustrated. he wanted to kill two face because he killed his father; he wanted to attack the pimp because he directly saw him beating up a woman; he might have killed garzonas because he had to witness gloria’s dead body and garzonas would walk free to do that to other women, just out of america.

jason’s not naturally violent and cruel, it’s what he’s learned is the only way to protect other victims in a world that perpetuates suffering.

i know starlin is seen as the main post-crisis jaybin writer but jason writers PLEASE read collins

(pictures are from batman #409 and #411)

i know starlin is seen as the main post-crisis jaybin writer but jason writers PLEASE read collins

(pictures are from batman #409 and #411)

“Jason’s approach to justice is right wing” we need to force people to actually read.

Claiming Jason is more right wing than Bruce the actual fucking billionaire is crazy. 

FINAL ROUND.