Being In A Relationship With A Man Requires Cognitive Dissonance. When You’re A Radfem In A Relationship

Women will complain about abortion bans and being treated like breeding mules but these same women (who are most likely moms) will shut down conversations that childfree women attempt to have about our experiences.

I stay within childfree spaces. I follow mostly childfree women on social media. I don't go online looking for spaces where mothers are talking about their experiences because I don't care.

However, whenever I go into the comment section of a childfree woman's post I see a lot of mothers commenting. Some of them criticizing, some giving backhanded compliments or their motherly approval nobody asked for, but what I find most interesting is how they will talk amongst themselves within the comments on posts or pages that are geared towards childfree women.

They know who's reading these posts, they know it's predominantly childfree looking for support or a place to share our experience being childfree. But still, I see comments along the lines of: "yeah yeah being childfree is great BUT LADIES CAN WE PLEASE DISCUSS THE BEAUTY OF MOTHERHOOD? ☺️"

Women police other women back into the roles that they simultaneously bitch about.

Whining about motherhood and how hard it is to a man but if a woman says she's childfree and wants fuck all to do with kids then she'll weaponize her societal status of mom to size up that woman and try to make her seem lesser.

It's passive aggressive and attention seeking behavior.

Behind every misogynist is a girlfriend/wife and/or mother who is okay with it.

You're not a dumbass if you like gossip and drama. Men created this myth so that women don't form friendships with each other, they called them stupid for talking to each other. Because if you can't gossip you won't tell your friends about how your husband treats you.

Being interested in people and social things and drama and arguments and all these things comes free with being a social species. Enjoy them all you want, it's neither stupid nor immoral.

sorry for shooting your dog with a crossbow you have to understand Im american our education system is in the gutter most of us were never taught that killing peoples beloved pets with medieval projectile weaponry is wrong and we're all too burnt out to research it on our own time

There are people who constantly make excuses for maIe identified women especially as they screw over other women and let me just say I do not give a single flying fuck. I dont care for their excuses or sob stories. I will not push them to do anything against their interest but I'm under no obligation to care about or help them when shit blows up in their face especially when they will be ruthless towards women like me. If they get fucked over & need assistance I'm not playing shero, they can go ask the moids they worship for help.

"But they're just trying to survive and protect themselves" so the fuck am I.

No offense but we all know that mikey madison and everyone in her likeness is just a whore and that women like that shouldnt have any kind of opportunities whatsoever, let alone to win a fucking oscar. Why are young women even entering that depraved industry when the whole planet knows that you have to suck and fuck your way through it to get anywhere? Everyone knows that all actors, models and singers are prostitutes, why do the viewers not boycott this shit? If you really must watch it then at the very least do not pay money for it. Hollywood is the biggest propaganda machine on the planet but all that feminists have to say to films like anora is, 'Well its mens fault that we are forced to be have plastic surgery, be a prostitute, degrade ourselves in xyz manner'. It has got completely pathetic now. Call a spade a spade: women who whore themselves out need to be renounced if not punished.

These women want to be hand-held and coddled as they willingly walk into the fire. It's just not gonna happen. Sorry. You're going to get criticism and pushback. You cannot navigate relationships with men safely. There will always be risks regardless of how many legal or cultural boundaries you attempt to put in place to protect women.

At this point you have already been told the risks of rape and violence; you have already been told the truth about male nature that you choose to ignore in favor of adopting the socialization cope; you already have abortifacients and contraception, as well as resources available for women in DV situations and these are not perfect solutions. So what is the last bastion of defense against males other than to avoid them altogether which the bulk of you refuse to do or act like if you do it Gilead will descend upon us as if it isn't already while women are still willingly giving men what they want?

It is illogical for OSA women to sit up here saying that men are evil predators, pedos, and rapists and then turn around and defend dick to the death, continuing to serve them and birth their sons.

You should be saying this to the MEN who deprive you women of safe, fulfilling relationships by being the way they are.

All WE are doing is pointing out that you are the ones choosing to date your oppressor, gamble with your lives, and choosing to pursue the same men that you KNOW are dangerous and deceptive. And then when you inevitably get burnt you throw tantrums towards the women who don't participate in your trauma-bonding circle-jerk and pat you on the back for what the big bad man did.

I always think it’s very interesting that Aileen Wuornos is consistently said to be one of the most notorious serial killers in history, despite the fact that if she was male, her victim count and murder method would barely be considered notable nevermind one of the worst.

She killed 7 Johns by shooting them in the head, yet she gets put on lists with men who raped, tortured, and killed 30+ people.

one of the most frustrating things about the neil gaiman situation (and others like it) is people who were fans immediately moving to a different person to idolise ('well, at least we still have x author' or 'please tell me y author is still a good person') and in this situation specifically, 'terry pratchett would be furious'. no!!! you do not know!!!you have no idea whether terry pratchett or any author you like was/is a predator! you cannot take a situation in which a man's public persona as a feminist and supporter of women allowed him to prey on vulnerable women without suspicion and then look at all the other men who portray themselves as good people and say 'well, these ones are still okay though.' just stop idolising celebrities!!!!!!!